Tag Archives: NFL

A slow death in Oakland

The Oakland A’s latest radio misstep is indicative of what I feel is the impending slow death of professional sports in the East Bay.

That the A’s are still searching for a flagship radio station two days before the start of what many feel is going to be a promising season is embarrassing for both fans and ownership.

All things seemed promising in the offseason at word that the A’s would be buying 50,000-watt radio station KTRB and changing the format into all sports, anti-KNBR (my words) and East Bay-heavy. Finally, a place the A’s could call home and an important, much-needed marketing tool.

But now it appears the deal is falling through, and the A’s could be back on 10,000-watt KFRC. (In Modesto, the A’s will still be broadcast on AM-970 regardless of its flagship station).

Regardless of the outcome, which one way or another will be resolved before Trevor Cahill’s first pitch on Friday night, it’s just one more head-scratcher for fans of East Bay sports.

It’s another in a long line of issues tied to facilities and marketing that will accelerate the Bay Area departures of the A’s and Raiders and the move by the Warriors into a new arena next to AT&T Park.

It also illustrates the pull and intelligence of KNBR, which broadcasts and markets the Giants, 49ers and Warriors. They are shameless in ignoring their slogan as “The Sports Leader” to simply pound their above brands. As a blogger somewhere pointed out: Look at their Web site. Under “team links” on their home page, they have the Giants, 49ers, Warriors and … the Sharks, a team they don’t even carry. Raiders, A’s anyone?

It’s smart of the station and it’s smart of those organizations to tie their brand to the most powerful marketing company in the Bay Area.

It all signals a demise of East Bay Sports. Here’s why:

Raiders: Mark my word that if Al Davis steps aside as Raiders boss, and the new stadium project in Los Angeles is still in search of a team, the Silver and Black will be back in LA.

It makes sense. LA will embrace the Raiders, but not Al Davis. The Raiders will embrace a new stadium, especially one they can call their own. I just don’t see the Vikings or Jaguars moving to LA. The city of San Diego will get a stadium built for the Chargers if push comes to shove.

As much sense as it makes for the Raiders and 49ers to share a stadium in the Bay Area, I just don’t see those two organizations working things out. The Raiders don’t play second fiddle to anyone, and that’s what they’d be in the 49ers-driven stadium in Santa Clara. The folks in Alameda are trying to sell the NFL on the Oakland Coliseum as a place to house both NFL teams. JaMarcus Russell will return to quarterback the Raiders before the NFL signs off on football in Oakland.

Mark my word. In 10 years, some way or another, the Raiders will be back in LA and the 49ers will own the Bay Area once and for all.

A’s: Given the economic climate in the Bay Area, the Giants ownership of the San Jose market, and the somewhat recent laissez-faire approach to ownership by Lew Wolff, it appears the A’s are on their way out.

There was an intriguing column by the Bay Area News Group’s Monte Poole about baseball actually wanting to contract the Devil Rays and the A’s and letting Wolff by the Los Angeles Dodgers. It wouldn’t be the first time in recent months Wolff’s name has been tied to potential ownership of the Southland team.

If the A’s can’t get a stadium built — and the longer it goes, the more likely that appears — I could see Wolff selling to an ownership group in a different city or state. You just can’t generate enough revenue at the Coliseum to remain competitive, Wolff complains.

I think San Jose would be great. But I just don’t see it happening. That Bud Selig’s so-called “Blue Ribbon Committee” is in Year 3 of making its decision about the rights to San Jose shows there is a real struggle in going against the Giants.

The A’s simply can’t stay at the Coliseum that much longer and given San Jose doesn’t seem to be an option, I can see Wolff simply throwing in the towel.

Warriors: This is only speculation on my part. But when the Warriors were for sale last year, there was some talk that the Giants might seek a piece of the Warriors.

The theory went that San Francisco wants an arena venue near downtown where the city could bring in musical acts for concerts. Said venue would be built in one of the Giants’ parking lots and the Warriors would eventually move in.

It make sense, although I was at Oracle Arena earlier this month for the first time in years and found it to be a wonderful facility.

Still, a new arena will always be better than an old one. Just ask the Sacramento Kings.

So, there’s my dire prediction of sports in the East Bay.

My hope would be for the Raiders and 49ers to share a stadium in Santa Clara and the Coliseum be demolished for a new baseball-only stadium.

Problem with that is Wolff clearly wants a stadium to be surrounded by other forms of revenue like condos, apartments and retail. Can’t picture that at the current site.

What are your thoughts? How would you solve the stadium problems for the A’s and Raiders? Leave a comment and let me know.

Leave a comment

Posted by on March 29, 2011 in Uncategorized


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The dreaded walk across Floyd at Millbrook

I would be curious for anyone’s thoughts on the marked crosswalk painted across Floyd Avenue at Millbrook Avenue six months ago.

If you’ll recall, a Dan Savage Middle School student was struck there by a sports utility vehicle in August. A month later, city crews put in a marked crosswalk and added warning lights to alert drivers heading east and west on Floyd.

Does the marked crosswalk make you feel safer or ease any concerns you have about your child walking unattended across what I like to refer to as “Floyd Avenue Speedway”? (I was walking the dog there the other night and saw someone I’d estimate racing 70 mph in a souped-up sedan.)

To be sure, the boy was found to be at fault, having darted in front of the SUV, police said. When I spoke with him last year, Jeff Barnes, the traffic engineer for the city, did talk about children needing a certain level of maturity when crossing “arterial roads.”

I get that.

Still, it’s a bad intersection for a couple of reasons.

1. Even as an adult, I don’t like crossing Floyd. The biggest reason are the drivers. They either drive too fast or don’t understand how to drive … or better yet, how to stop … at a crosswalk. How many times have you stepped into the intersection when it’s all clear on your side, only to see an oncoming car on the other? Then, as you continue walking to get to the median, the oncoming car blows through the crosswalk at the same speed or, seemingly worse, slows down but continues through giving you a sheepish look like “Oh, I think I was supposed to stop for you, but I’m not sure, so I’m going to keep driving.”

2. Seemingly worse is playing “Frogger” in the mornings or afternoons on school days when driving to work or driving my son home from school. I try to avoid the mess altogether by leaving early to work or finding an alternate route after school. But how many of us have been stuck in a line of cars at the stop sign on Millbrook … in either direction … trying to cross Floyd? You’ve got three issues: 1. Trying to find an open spot between cars on Floyd. 2. Predicting if the oncoming car on Millbrook is going straight or turning left. 3. Appeasing the person behind you who’s on your bumper thinking, “Why isn’t this person going?”

In the end, I think the marked crosswalk has been the best solution. I couldn’t see waiting at a stop light or stopping at a stop sign on Floyd at 10 p.m. on a Saturday night when nobody was around. When I spoke with the city traffic engineer last year, he laid out a fairly well-reasoned response as to why, at least for now, a marked crosswalk is the best solution.

One potential, and obvious solution to help ease tension at that intersection, is to walk more. Yeah, I know. I stated above that the intersection is dicey for pedestrians. But the more drivers see people in that crosswalk, the more they’ll get in the habit of actually stopping. As I’ve learned in my 20 years in Modesto, drivers will eventually come around to learning the rules of the road.

What are your thoughts? Do you want to see a light or a stop sign? Do you think a crosswalk is enough? Is the intersection even an issue for you? Let me know by leaving a comment.

VOICEOVERS: If you don’t know or haven’t heard, all the baseball games at Bel Passi today have been rained out. Last Saturday’s game was the coldest day game I had ever attended. No way with the rain today. That’s unfortunate. Losing an entire Saturday is rough for the hard-working schedulers. … Earlier this week, I was extolling the virtues of the A’s flagship station, KTRB (860-AM). Now, it seems, there might be an issue and the team might be hunting for a new station. Not a good thing a week before the season starts. Here’s a story about what’s going on. … I have to admit, I’m an NFL draftnik. Anyone see a good draft magazine out yet?

Leave a comment

Posted by on March 26, 2011 in Uncategorized


Tags: , , , , ,